Tuesday, 30 March 2010

Mother Nature Throws the Racing World a Curveball!

Two weeks ago, the world had to be woken up from its F1 induced slumber.

This week, just when F1 needed to look good, against all odds, the weather delivered a wakeup call.

To be fair the Australian GP is generally one of the better races, but this years was good!! Did I just say that?? Let me try that again... the GP was good!! See, I said it again... and I meant it.

Somebody in the F1 paddock must have performed a major rain dance, as the only way the race was going to be any good, if the first race and the drivers opinions were anything to go by, was for something to upset the balance. Thankfully the weather did just that. We had a first corner incident, overtaking, pit strategy, overtaking, late race drama, overtaking, and a surprise winner. WOW!!

Please, please, please let it rain again next time!!

While mother nature did F1 a favour, American auto racing was not so lucky as the top three racing events, NASCAR, IRL, and NHRA were all postponed to the Monday.

FoxSports are currently running a poll - Question, "Was Denny Hamlin too aggressive in Martinsville?" At the time of writing, with more than 7000 votes cast, over 60% said "Yes", with an even split of the rest voting for "No"  or "Thats Racing".

What do NASCAR fans want? I feel sorry for NASCAR. They let the drivers "Have at it boys", an attempt to reintroduce drama back into the Cup races, and now it is happening the fans think the driving is too aggressive. It wasn't just Hamlin at the end, the whole race was a bit physical, its Martinsville, what do you expect. Would you want it any other way??

The end of the race was great. Proper, hard, bump 'n' run, short track, "honest to god," edge of your seat NASCAR racing. The G-W-C rule and the 2 wide restarts did just what the racing Doctor ordered yet again, creating excitement.

NASCAR - More short tracks please!!

Also... Welcome back to the rear spoiler. As a self confessed COT fan from the start, even I must say again... the cars look better with the spoiler. Lets hope they race well come Texas.
Lastly... Well done to Paul Bonhomme who won the opening round of the 2010 Red Bull Air Race World Championship. What those guys do in the air is stunning!

See ya'll next time.

Monday, 22 March 2010

Bristol... just Bristol!!

There are three sites in NASCAR I never tire of; 43 cars drafting at 190mph two or three wide round Daytona or Talladega, a heavy stock car getting good air time when bouncing over the kerbs at Infineon, and Bristol... just Bristol.


Some fans miss the close quarters, heavy hitting, physical nature of the old track but to me the track now, with its multi-angled banking, produces some great racing.



Two or three grooves of real racing room, two wide restarts, Edwards and Keselowski (after their trip to the NASCAR hauler) going side by side. JJ and Busch hard at it. Other drivers having their moment in the spot light - JPM, Biffle, Earnhardt. All this made for great entertainment. Throw in some tire gambling which paid off for Keselowski for most of the race but faded at the end, and worked for Stewart the other way round, added to the excitement.

NASCAR go to some tracks that fans complain the drivers can't race at, but I must mention Marcos Ambrose who proved single handed that Bristol is not one of those tracks. It would be great for NASCAR if Ambrose or JPM stayed at the front and could turn the occasional good run into consistently good finishes and preferably wins.

It would also be good for NASCAR if someone; anyone in fact, could actually beat JJ to the chequered. Like it or not JJ is good! While Busch lead the most laps, and JJ just hung around for most of the race waiting for his moment, it was inevitable. We knew early on that JJ had a good car for the short runs, and Busch was better at the long runs. But this was Bristol, and what were the chances of having a long, yellow free run to the finish? Saying that it was a shame that Busch couldn't stick with JJ after the last GWC to see whether JJ's high groove setup could beat Busch's low groove car.

Gotta love JJ for one thing, watching him doing a burnout against the wall was only bettered by his rolling burnout going into Victory Lane!!

Now somebody please introduce the other drivers front bumpers to JJ's rear and let Martinsville commence!!

One last thing - RIP wing, worth a try, now re-welcome the spoiler!!

Tuesday, 16 March 2010

Cup Photos - Just Because I Can!!

Great looking retro Valvoline paint job!!
Finally the 88 looks good!!


 Cup car with new old new spoiler!!
I did not mind the wing... but even I must admit the spoiler does look good!!

Racing or Technology


It was one hell of a build up, 4 World Champions, Schumachers come-back, new teams...   

The end result was... disappointing.


F1 ZZZZZZzzzzzzz

Mercedes GP CEO Nick Fry - "The most important people are the customers - they are the people who pay to come to races, or watch it on television. We are beholden on them to put on a good show and we should see what we should do." 

Michael Schumacher - "Overtaking is basically impossible..."

Lewis Hamilton - "It definitely didn't make the racing more exciting in terms of overtaking. I wasn't able to follow in the first third of the circuit."
 
At the start of 2009 the FIA revamped the F1 technical regulations, eliminating most of the aero influencing add-ons, and changing the wing dimensions for all cars. The end result was a set of cars that moved around, oversteered, and that could follow each other closer than F1 cars had for a long time. The cars made for some, dare I say it, good racing. Unfortunately for racing fans the FIA deemed Brawn GPs rear diffuser to be legal, even though it was against the "spirit of the regulations". In typical F1 fashion this meant that everybody had to have the same diffusers on their cars and before we knew it the cars were generating more downforce than they had before the FIAs aero cut.

The FIA and the teams have now decided that these twin rear diffusers will be banned from next season. The cars also seem to have sprouted previously banned barge boards, the most intricate front and rear wings you have ever seen, and elaborate engine covers and scoops influencing the flow of air to the rear wing. F1 has always been about pushing the technical envelope, developing new ways of going faster, changing gear quicker, accelerating away from the start line better, going round corners and stopping more effectively, using technology to be the fastest. Aerodynamics, launch control, semi automatic then basically automatic gearboxes, traction control, carbon brakes, super sticky tyres, race cars controlled by lap top programmers as much as set up by chassis engineers are the F1 norm.

At one time the powers that be in F1 didn't care how many people watched the result of all this development, but this has changed in recent years. F1 teams, sponsors and manufacturers now need exposure to as many people as possible to make the huge costs involved worth while.


Here is my conundrum...

Can F1 continue to have a fairly relaxed set of technical regulations, allowing the teams to continue to push the envelope while also producing a "show" that people actually want to watch? All this technology means the drivers do less, drive very high speed but also very efficient race cars, but they don't even change gear! If F1 really do care about the show they need to balance the aero and technical evolution with a set of regulations producing cars that can race close together and overtake, and stop the teams from adding aero pieces that effect this balance. But is the tightness of regulation and organisational control needed to ensure this works contrary to what F1 is all about?


All regulation changes need a settling in period, and the latest race format in F1 is no different. Let's get one thing clear, the lack of refuelling and the qualifying format and tyre regulations did not make for a classic opener to the season (leader 2 seconds up after 1 lap!!), which is just what the world wanted, and what F1 needed!

To me it's not the lack of refuelling that's the problem; it is the inability of the cars to drive close together and race that needs addressing. But then something's never change.


Another COT... ish...

Australia, and the V8 Supercars, the last remaining home for rear wheel drive / big engined touring car racing, are soon to announce a totally new car package. The theory is that the "Car of the Future" (COF), will be a generic purpose built rear wheel drive race car, and not based on production car shells.

Touring car racing in Australia has always been about Ford vs. Holden, production based RWD sedans with V8 engines going head to head around Bathurst. Changing this format is a big deal. The idea is that the new regulations will allow other manufacturers to enter the series, but to me surely the point is to allow Ford and Holden to stay in the series, and to allow the series to maintain a V8 RWD base.

Let me explain. Falcons and Commodores are not selling in Australia. Ford and GM are not as financially stable as years past. What are the chances of the Australian arms of Ford and GM being allowed to develop their own RWD replacements, independent of the rest of the world? There is a chance that the next generation Falcon and Commodore will be based on "world" platforms, which may bring front wheel drive to Australian sedans. In reality we have no idea if this is correct but if I was the V8 Supercar organisers this is what I would fear. There is nothing worse for touring cars than front wheel drive.

So how do you ensure a future for your RWD, V8, production sedan based championship under threat from front wheel drive road cars? You develop a standardised, specifically developed RWD race car, and let the manufacturers clothe the cars in their own bodywork, and fit their own V8.


We will find the details out just after the Australian GP. I get the feeling that the V8 Supercar race and the following announcement will be more exciting than the headlining GP!

Wednesday, 10 March 2010

"Have at it, boys"

"The pass in the grass..."
"I wasn't trying to wreck him, I just wanted to rattle his cage..."
"Take care of it now???" 

NASCAR - "HAVE AT IT, BOYS"


Earnhardt vs. Everybody... 
Waltrip vs. Earnhardt... 
Irvan vs. Everybody...
Kyle Busch vs. Everybody... 
Keselowski vs. Everybody... 
Edwards vs. Keselowski... 


Shovin'...
Pushin'...
Leaning...
Rubbin'...
Bump draftin'...


I call it all... NASCAR!! 

You can debate the merits, the downfalls, the downright lunacy, the fabulous possibilities created by NASCARs decision to put Carl Edwards on probation for three races, and nothing more (Bristol, Martinsville, Phoenix) but please please debate it!! 

Fans will spend the next two weeks in homes, in bars, on web forums, even on facebook pages, discussing, debating, and probably arguing over what Edwards did, and what NASCAR have done about it.

The good thing is that people are talking about NASCAR!!

Tuesday, 9 March 2010

NASCAR Talking Points

After four rounds the NASCAR has thrown up a few interesting story lines.
    • JJ wins in California... and Las Vegas! Sounds exciting doesn't it?
    Actually I thought the first "real" race of the season, California, was pretty good. It did get a little strung out in places, and the momentum of the race was lost with the short rain delay in the middle but there was a lot of good 2 or 3 wide racing throughout. The drivers seemed able to find lines that worked for their cars at various stages through a run, and at such a wide race track they have a lot of room to manoeuvre.


    JJ's second win of 2010, in Vegas, was not as exciting but has started his 5th Championship run of to a flying start. Las Vegas is not a favourite track of mine, despite being the track I went to see my one and one NASCAR race in person, the then Busch Series race 13 years ago, the year of the first Cup race their. This years Cup race was not great, only really lifted by the Gordon vs. Johnson duel.
    •  Danica has arrived!
    After the past few years of seemingly predictable headlines (JJ wins again again, 88 does... well... not a lot, ticket sales going down, COT whinge whinge etc) anything that creates a buzz around NASCAR has got to be a good thing.

    So far Danica has shown herself to be good with the media, and apparently a good learner in the car. The results weren't great, as was inevitable for such a fairy tale story but the potential is there. The main question I have is this; with the Nationwide COT coming next year why teach Danica to drive an out of date car? I could understand putting her in the car for this years "new car races" and then moving her up to do more races next year but surely this is the long-winded way. I hope she does well, and think she will, once she gets over the rookie mistake period and once she spends the time to gather the experience needed to race with the big boys.
    • RPM, Childress, EGR doing well.
    A couple of years ago Roush with Edwards dominated a large part of the year, with Kyle Busch near him. JJ and Hendrick have now won 4 Championships. What NASCAR needs in Cup are stories, preferably with other drivers and teams doing well creating those stories. What they also need are Ford back in the game. With Kasey Kahne and AJ driving RPMs new Fords, Childress with Harvick currently top of the standings, McMurray and JPM staying near the front for EGR and Dodge winning in Atlanta with Kurt Busch 2010 so far has some different names battling at the front! So far the competition is looking good and varied, but NASCAR badly needs these guys to stay at the front and start or keep winning races as the year progresses.
    • Increased Speeds.
    The past few races have shown that while they are not perfect, Goodyear are now producing much better tires for the COT. They are also producing quicker lap times all over the place. These big numbers may help write headlines, but to me increased speeds do not always help the racing. The quicker cars go round a track, the more of a one line track it can become, making it hard to overtake. To me NASCAR need to be careful not to let speeds increase too much at the 1.5 mile tracks as lower speeds with more 2 wide racing is better than faster 1 groove races.
    •  Paybacks a Bitch - or - Edwards vs. Keselowski
    Payback, retaliation, getting even, "take care of it now", call it what you will, Edwards is guilty of it, and is admitting it! Keselowski may have deserved some kind of "back at ya" but not even Edwards would have wanted to put him on his roof. The driver of the 12 car is generally thought to be aggressive and physical but as far as Edwards goes am I the only one who actually thinks that he pulled down on Keselowski at 'Dega and earlier in the Atlanta race?

    If I was NASCAR what would I do?

    The governing body spent a lot of time in the build up to this season saying they want the drivers to be more aggressive, giving them the chance to bump draft at the plate races, letting them express themselves on and off track, "old school" if you will! It doesn't get more "old school" than having a grudge, and letting the other driver know about it, on-track! NASCAR parked Edwards straight away and to me that's enough. If you want the action, if you want the headlines, if you want the fans talking about NASCAR for all the right reasons then this is the sort of racing you want. NASCAR needs a driver the fans hate and love to hate. It used to be the 3 car, more recently it was the 18 but the last couple of years NASCAR has been missing the bad guy. Let Keselowski be the bad guy. Bad guys can do very well out of being the bad guy. Let the fans boo you; let the drivers hate you... if you can deliver the results on the track!

    Edwards deserved to be parked. NASCAR can not let that sort of incident go without punishment and parking a driver for the remainder of the race, to me, is a given. Does it require any more? Driving the wrong way up the pit lane was stupid and may net him an additional penalty, but if Edwards had just succeeded in putting the 12 in the wall, or if he had just moved him out of the way and not put the 12 on its roof would the reaction have been so extreme? NASCAR, have the guts to let the drivers breath, let them get annoyed, let them get physical as you promised. Maybe dock him any points he gained for that race, so he gets nothing from the weekend? Edwards may have taken it too far, maybe he should have put the bumper on him and moved him as opposed to, quite frankly, stuffing him in the wall, but NASCAR needs to be careful not to be too strict thereby taking the edge off the "Old School" feel they are trying to go back to. If it had happened at Bristol, we would call it racing!

    It was Hamlin vs. Keselowski, now its Edwards vs. Keselowski, next it could be The World vs. Keselowski. My money's on Keselowski, if he plays it right!!

    The pity of this situation is that the Atlanta race leads into the years first off weekend. I hope the week off and the impending NASCAR decision, while dealing with it doesn't take the momentum out of this story, especially going into a run of three short tracks!
    • Empty Seats
    It was painfully obvious after the past two weeks that not all Cup race are going to sell out this year. The financial situation in the world is not going to help sporting events like NASCAR races, as when money is tight people stay in and watch TV, as opposed to going to the events in person. I also think this was going to happen anyway. NASCAR attendance and TV figures grew throughout the 1990's to a very high height, and the tracks were re-developed to accommodate the large numbers of people. It couldn't last forever. The question was, once NASCARs increase evened out, and then dipped, how far would it fall, and the financial issues in the world has not helped.

    This huge rise in the 1990's is also making NASCARs life much harder when it comes to delivering a show. Some fans consider a race dull and boring if it is not full of wrecks, and is not won after at least one G-W-C by more than an inch. NASCAR race on different styles of tracks and have different lengths of races. Some lend themselves to gas mileage races, some 2 by 2 - inches apart racing, some bump and grind action, some tactical handling tracks using different grooves to make the cars work, on some tracks the cars run restrictor plates, on some the drivers even turn right. NASCAR is varied and so are the races.

    To me the racing so far this year has been good. The two wide restarts, shuffling the pack so the leader is always in front, and the green-white-chequered finishes are spicing up the action, leading to some good racing. This good racing can only help the attendance and viewing figures!

    Roll on Bristol!!